For environmental chemistry professor Susan Richardson, it’s a question she hears
a lot: Is bottled water safer to drink than tap water? To help her investigate, she
enlisted honors biochemistry students Gretchen Bollar and Anthony Kocur. The pair
spent a year and a half analyzing 10 brands of bottled water, tap water and their
control “ultrapure” water.
Bollar and Kokur’s study was the first comprehensive look at the chemicals present
in bottled water. While it was suspected that bottled water might have lower levels
of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and other chemicals than tap water, no one had ever
investigated this before.
Bollar and Kokur quantified 70 regulated and unregulated DBPs, quantified total organic
chlorine, bromine and iodine, and conducted non-target analysis using mass spectrometry
to identify any other chemicals in their test waters.
What did the young scientists find? Basically, that bottled water has fewer DBPs than
tap water. That’s a good thing, because many DBPs have been identified as “highly
toxic,” Richardson says.
Still, Richardson is not suggesting that everyone start drinking bottled water.
“It’s important to note that bottled water is not regulated in the same way that our
tap water is, and our drinking water treatment plants do a great job of killing the
harmful bacteria to make it safe to drink,” she says. “At the same time, my group
is investigating the use of granular activated carbon to remove DBP precursors and
reduce DBP formation in our tap water. This would be like having a giant Brita filter
at the drinking water treatment plant. So far, the results are promising. The goal
of our research is to make good drinking water safer.”
The researchers stress that their work wasn’t designed to test which brand of bottled
water is the safest, best or cleanest — only which waters have fewer DBPs. The results
were consistent across the name brands and the store brands of bottled water they
tested.
“We really didn’t see anything that made a single brand stand out dramatically from
the others,” Bollar says.
The results of their research, funded by Magellan, SURF, and Honors Thesis grants,
will be submitted to a scientific journal. Bollar and Kocur are joint first authors;
thesis director Richardson and her graduate students Amy Cuthbertson, Josh Allen and
Hannah Liberatore, who assisted and helped oversee the project, are coauthors.
Their groundbreaking research also earned the pair the 2019 William A. Mould Outstanding
Senior Thesis Award. And is goes without saying that the same opportunity exists for
all undergraduates in the College of Arts and Sciences. Students can talk to their
advisor or visit the Student Excellence Collaborative to explore research opportunities.
“This project really proved to me that if I set my mind to a task, I’m going to see
it through,” Bollar says. “There were times when I was frustrated or busy and didn’t
want to work anymore, but I kept going because I knew the end result would be worth
it.”
This article is adapted from “To drink or not to drink (tap or bottled water)” by Aida Rogers.
College of Arts and Sciences
- SC.edu
- Study
- Colleges and Schools
- College of Arts and Sciences
- About
- News
- 2019 News Archive
- Biochemistry undergrads decide to test the waters