Go to USC home page USC Logo
 

AN ASSESSMENT OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA


By Drs. Michael R. Smith and Jeffrey Rojek
Criminology and Criminal Justice Department

In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, University of South Carolina researchers set out to examine the crisis response of state and local law enforcement agencies to the disaster. The media reported the tremendous difficulties of law enforcement agencies in the Gulf Coast region facing tremendous difficulties in their attempts to save lives, safeguard property, and maintain order after the hurricane’s landfall.

An Assessment of the Law Enforcement Response to Hurricane Katrina depended on site observations, interviews, and document reviews to examine the strengths and weaknesses of the state and local law enforcement response to Katrina. The researchers’ goals were: (1) to assess the state of pre-disaster planning among Gulf Coast law enforcement agencies before Katrina, (2) to understand how law enforcement agencies responded to Katrina and its aftermath, and (3) to evaluate how agencies reconstituted themselves in the months after the deadly storm.

Several questions shaped the project: Did agencies have formal plans for responding to disaster? What organizational and operational difficulties did agencies face? What public safety problems emerged? How were they managed? What changes occurred in the law enforcement mission? How did agencies cope with the loss of equipment, facilities, and personnel?

When USC researchers made their first trip to the Gulf Coast region at the beginning of October 2005, conditions were still primitive. Their sleeping quarters were tents, jail facilities and storerooms. Without the assistance of several high-ranking law enforcement officials who facilitated their research, they would not have gained access to the affected areas and personnel.

USC researchers found that law enforcement and other government officials were willing to admit failures so that others could learn from their mistakes. One mistake was inadequate disaster planning at both the local and state level along the Gulf Coast. The lesson: Other regions should move quickly in the aftermath of Katrina to improve their own planning and response capabilities.

USC researchers also found that most law enforcement agencies in the Gulf Coast region had not adequately practiced disaster response. Their research indicated that major disasters require pre-planned lines of command and control to coordinate the response of multiple public safety agencies, including those from out of state. It is clear from their studies that state and local law enforcement agencies must be familiar with the Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC) system for requesting out-of-state assistance and should have a streamlined process in place for making EMAC requests.

Moreover, USC researchers concluded that redundant and interoperable communications systems are vital. The good news is that these capacities can be developed at the state and local levels with existing technologies. USC researchers determined that generators, batteries, chainsaws, extra radios, and a five-day supply of food and water for law enforcement personnel should be stockpiled as part of a comprehensive disaster plan.
Finally, USC research made it clear that providing medical and psychological care for first responders is an important, but often overlooked, component of disaster planning. And, that search and rescue, point-of-distribution security, looting, and traffic control are expected law enforcement priorities following a disaster.

The lessons learned from this research have broad implications for law enforcement agencies throughout the country. The bottom line is that state and local agencies must significantly improve their ability to respond to natural and man-made disasters and must assume greater responsibility for disaster preparedness. Indeed, law enforcement plays a critical role in responding to disasters. To the extent that lessons can be learned from the Katrina experience, law enforcement agencies will be better prepared to save lives, safeguard property, and maintain public order in the wake of the next disaster.

Disasters such as Katrina impact people regardless of race, gender, religion, or socioeconomic status. Today, the FEMA-created trailer parks that dot the landscape of the Gulf Coast region house African Americans and Caucasians, young and old, and rich and poor. All are struggling to cope and rebuild their lives. USC researchers reported this was the best and most personally satisfying research experience of their careers. They felt humbled that the law enforcement personnel with whom they spoke were so willing to admit their mistakes so that others could learn from them.

This project allowed USC researchers to make many valuable contacts with state and local law enforcement officials in the area. Several have agreed to share crime and related data to help USC researchers quantitatively assess the impact of Katrina on crime and citizen demand for police services. The final report has been published and disseminated to many law enforcement agencies throughout the Southeast. In addition, USC researchers have coordinated law enforcement disaster symposiums in South Carolina and published study findings in scholarly journals.

Biographies

Dr. Michael R. Smith is an associate professor and graduate director in the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of South Carolina. He is also a former police officer and holds a J.D. from the University of South Carolina and a Ph.D. in Justice Studies from Arizona State University.

Dr. Jeffrey Rojek is an assistant professor in the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of South Carolina. Prior to his professorship, Rojek was a police officer in Los Angeles Police Department.