Members of the Department of Political Science have received four research grants
from the University’s vice-provost for research to study the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Department Chair Kirk Randazzo comments: “As Chair of the Department of Political
Science, I am extremely proud of my colleagues for engaging in research related to
COVID-19. The project descriptions demonstrate the importance of examining different
aspects of governmental responses to crises. From the preliminary results I have already
seen, these research projects have generated insights that possess profound policy
implications which governmental actors should take into account as they develop additional
responses and alternatives to rapidly changing circumstances.” The following projects
on COVID-19 are taking place.
Elizabeth Connors seeks to develop a better understanding of individual behavior during
national crises. Local graduate students Chandler Case, Chris Eddy, Rahul Hemrajani,
Chris Howell, Daniel Lyons, and Yu-Hsien Sung are part of this effort. The project
seeks to understand how source cues and framing influence individual behavior during
national crises. In the particular context of the COVID-19 crisis, the researchers
examine the public’s reception of the information they receive from medical experts
and whether those responses are influenced by if the information given is fact or
experience or based on a loss or gains frame. Importantly, they ask if public distrust
in experts remains in a high stakes health crisis or if this context drives individuals
to listen to experts over “common sense.” Findings will speak to effective (or ineffective)
communication strategies during large-scale crises.
Tobias Heinrich is joining Menevis Cilizoglu (St Olaf College) and Yoshiharu Kobayashi
(University of Leeds) to examine what prompts governments to close borders for international
travel and to which extent people are willing to give up civil liberties. Preliminary
findings suggest that cues from the World Health Organization as well as counterfactual
considerations—what if the border had stayed open?— explain variation in people’s
endorsements of border closures. Similarly preliminary findings reveal that worries
about COVID-19 lead to an embrace of more aggressive, privacy-invading public policies
but such support declines sharply as the expected duration of these policies increases.
Kelsey Shoub examines how elite cues shape social cleavages. Little is known about
how those cues translate into individual action when they conflict along party lines,
among party elites, or across levels of government as in the United States. As such, studies tracing elite discourse on
COVID-19 and linking it to individual behavior are need. The researchers propose to
do by examining elite discourse on Twitter and television news and through a set of
survey experiments. Together, these pieces can aid in modeling outbreaks and informing policies—now and
in the future. Kelsey Shoub is joined by Skyler Cranmer (The Ohio State University)
and Ohio State graduate students for this research.
Katelyn Stauffer and Susan Miller investigate citizens’ compliance with government
policies during the COVID-19 crisis. Lael Keiser (University of Missouri) is also
part of this research. One of the major questions in a democratic society for policymakers
and researchers is how to encourage compliance with the law. The ongoing COVID-19
crisis and subsequent stay-at-home orders provide an opportunity to explore the factors
that lead citizens to comply with (or defy) government policies. This study uses mobility
data to examine compliance with various state and local stay-at-home orders, and how
compliance is shaped by representation, institutional, and other political factors.
We couple this observational analysis with experimental data that allows us to isolate
the causal mechanisms underlying citizen compliance.